Writing is fundamental?

Posted on: Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
Comments: 3

If we are to enjoy more, we must expect more. Demand more. Good reading begins with better writing. Thus, we must be vigilant, calling out those writers whose efforts to entertain and enlighten us are approached more lazily than Rob Schneider prepping for DEUCE BIGALOW 3: THE FINAL BLOW.

It’s one thing to write poorly, that’s permissible in journals and personal correspondence. It’s another to have sub-par prose published in a major paper, indicating that both an editor and a bean-counter have somehow approved such amateur ramblings.

I deputize you, dear readers, to submit your own examples. For now, let me offer this shard of broken glass on which I pricked my eyes in this Sunday’s edition (1/10/10) of Parade Magazine. The article’s title: “Live Well With What You Have.” The perpetrator: Lynn Schnumberger. Under the subheading ‘Get What You Need,’ she begins…

“To paraphrase the Rolling Stones, you can’t always get everything you want.”

Wow. What a colorful and insightful phrasing to lure the reader, Lynn. So impressive, so illustrative, I decided to explore LexisNexis for more of Ms. Schnumberger’s lyrical lead-ins. Here’s what I found…

From “Spare Change – Where’d It Go?”:

Who amongst us hasn’t paraphrased Bono while turning over couch cushions in search of laundry money, “But I still have not found that for which it is I am looking.”

From “L.A. Riots Make Rodney King For A Day”:

The beaten but not broken Mr. King rallied the crowd, paraphrasing the old War tune, “Why cannot we develop meaningful friendships?”

From Cradle To Rave – Oh, How Kids Dance These Days:

They jumped. They jived. To paraphrase OutKast, they would “flip it, flap it, wave it around in the air hoping that regardless of the physics of chemical reactions it would develop faster like a Polaroid picture.”


Please, Ms. Schnumberger, return your check to the publisher or, better yet, donate your ‘earnings’ to the local literacy program of your choosing.

3 Responses to “Writing is fundamental?”

  1. nimbleland@att.net Says:

    Warren,

    I understand your anger, frustration, etc, but what this also shows is a formula, a choice the writer makes to open his/her thoughts. It could also should be that this writer loves music and makes a point of working paraphrased lyrics into every introduction.

    Now am I right? Who knows, but this is just as valid as speculation laziness. That’s your personal point in your blog, but as a writer and teacher, you should widen your view to include more than one possibility.

  2. Warren Says:

    Well, David, even if the writer is a music fan, that doesn’t give her license to butcher lyrics in order to make a tepid point. Perhaps it isn’t laziness, but it will still count as sub-bar craft.

    Also, what you may wish to attribute to style, isn’t necessarily good form. Just because Charlie Sheen has a pattern of abusing his wives, doesn’t mean its an approach we need condone.

    If we cannot challenge artists to perform better, why should we demand we ourselves improve?

  3. Two And A Half Man-Children | The Warren Report Says:

    [...] * With apologies to Mark Knopfler and Lynn Schnumberger [...]

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.