A case of two kettles: Woody nettles Dov, Apparel settles suit

Posted on: Wednesday, June 3rd, 2009
Comments: 1

Woody Allen might want to stop making movies and just start suing people. Recently, he settled his lawsuit against American Apparel for $5 million. To put that in perspective, CASSANDRA’S DREAM — the writer-director’s sonorous yet snoozy moral tale of money-troubled siblings — took in just $972 thousand at the box office. Originally, he’d demanded $10 million from Dov Charney, which is just around as much as HOLLYWOOD ENDING, ANYTHING GOES and MELINDA AND MELINDA made combined. So, not a bad haul considering the “crime.” 

woody-allen-american-apparel-adHere’s the deal: the soft-core-marketed clothing company posted a billboard with an image from ANNIE HALLwith the Woodman dressed up as a Hasidic Jew. Accompanying Hebrew text identified him as “the Holy rebbe.” (How this was to help sell tank tops to kids who probably couldn’t distinguish between Mr. Allen and,  say, a any other funny-looking old Jew, is beyond me.) And yes, Woody took offense. A man infamously caught with his hand in his stepdaughter’s cookie jar claimed his character had been defamed. (He might consider going after Paul Mazursky for casting him in SCENES FROM A MALL while he’s at it.) Charney threatened to revisit all of the plaintiff’s borderline-pedophilic peccadillos to prove Allen had already ruined his own reputation, thus devaluing the worth of his image. Ironically, American Apparel’s empire was built on pubescent two-backed beasts, a steady stream of Madison Avenue kiddie porn equal parts Penthouse and Calvin Klein. In the end, Charney caved suggesting his lawyers advised him to settle. I like to think the chick-magnate was repelled by the hypocrisy of his defense, then dropped his legal briefs. 

woody-vs-dovIf Woody saw himself reflected in the eyes and actions of his courtroom challenger, perhaps he’d realize his own shortcomings and donate the money to a deserving charity such as… CAPA, the Child Abuse Prevention Association.

One Response to “A case of two kettles: Woody nettles Dov, Apparel settles suit”

  1. Cheryl Says:

    Here! Here! to that. The fact that Mr. Allen or AA remain filthy rich and still in business in the face of Allen’s incestuous kiddie diddling and AA’s proliferation of skinny pre-pubs in Playboy poses as the standard of beauty in America and the standard for selling clothes is a sad statement about America’s bend-over-no matter-how-wrong-it-is and accept attitude. My daughter spends hours in front of her mirror trying to replicate AA allure. She’s 13, she barely has breasts . Any parent of a daughter, minimally, should boycott Woody Allen anything and put AA out of business by refusing to buy. Thanks, Warren, for sending people to a useful advocacy site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.